It has dawned on me that personal health records – by which you can play with all your details and history on the internet – will soon be a way of life. The political, health and IT worlds all seem fairly convinced.
In an effort to get ahead of the curve I decided to sign up with all the big names.
When the IT self-care new dawn comes, I will be saved from the queue outside my GP’s crappy end-of-terrace while everyone else is still lining up to ask how to log on.
First, Google Health. I signed up, entered the necessary particulars – which were very few – and was presented with choosing from (long) lists of conditions I might have and drugs I might be on.
In the absence of anything worse I tried to enter a pollen and cat fur allergy. An option came up about pollen extracts. I have a feeling they are only interested in more serious allergies. Shouldn’t someone else know this for me?
Playing with Google Health quickly became dominated by options to link to various US healthcare providers which, were I a customer, would have allowed me to update my records with some proper information.
There was a “health butler” that monitors your diet and heart rate and so on. Some sounded helpful and they highlight untapped potential for prevention and self care.
But the multitude of options, most of which were labelled “fees apply”, also prompt images of the dystopia, real or imagined, described in some of the recent #welovetheNHS coverage.
The other big-name potential provider is Microsoft’s HealthVault. I started signing up. Microsoft knew my date of birth already. I even uploaded a picture, giving the whole process a Facebook feel, and wanted the world to read my health record.
But it wasn’t to be: “Microsoft HealthVault is not currently available in your country/region. We are working to make HealthVault available in more countries and regions, and we encourage you to try again at a later date.”
Finally, UK plc’s own solution, the National Programme for IT-developed HealthSpace. HealthSpace did not know my date of birth already, nor anything else about me.
The website is full of tools for charting my own health via weight and cholesterol and what not, and this time all for free.
You can even upgrade to a HealthSpace “advanced” account and link to your summary care record… but only if you live in the (few and far between) early adopter areas.
This is surely what the technology is all about: actually bringing together your information in one place, that can be updated (when appropriate) by professionals.
I lied and said I lived in Bolton but stopped when I had to pick a GP surgery.
There’s no telling what would have happened after that, but I have a feeling even genuine Bolton residents may, for now, be disappointed.
HealthSpace stressed: “Your local NHS will advise you if any of these new services are available in your area. Please check with your Primary Care Trust and GP Practice for further information.”
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment.







Readers' comments (1)
anonymous | 7-Sep-2009 10:39 pm
Diagnosis is the key. Once a condition is diagnosed it is very easy to point the patient at the right specialist/consultant. Without a correct diagnosis there is no hope and large sums of money and resources are wasted.
The main really useful use of the Internet in this respect would be to have a diagnostic knowledge base in which anyone can enter their life long symptoms as a time line. The pattern of their symptoms should then be compared to others for various diseases to produce a likely diagnosis.
For Example:
Symptoms experienced:
Migraines in youth 10-14 years
Gastro intestinal disorders 18years- 60
Cold legs 30 years to 60
Skin disorders, slight whole life
Memory problems, slight whole life
Balance problems, a few short bouts of severe to slight. 30 -60
Pins and needles in extremities from time to time, iinfrequent and slight maybe.
Zig Zag flashes around peripheral vision from time to time.
Tinnitus (Ringing in ears) from time to time
Plus a whole host of other minor seemingly random symptoms
The knowledge data base would then come back with a likely diagnosis. There are data bases out there containing 15,000 or more diseases and I defy a GP to remember anywhere near that number. I guess probably 1000 or so at best.
Incidentally the above disease is not Multiple Sclerosis it is something else which in fact is much more deadly and likely more common.
Although it is a well documented disease with anywhere from 100,000 to 1,000,000 mostly undiagnosed sufferers in the UK most GPs and consultants do not even know it exists such are the frailties of using humans to diagnose diseases.
With a diagnostic knowledge database for all of us to use we could save the health service millions every year in incorrect diagnosis of diseases by humans relying on memory.
Unsuitable or offensive?