Report comment

At the 12th December meeting Bristol City Councillors questioned Dr O'Kelly on his statement. At one point in the meeting he said:

"There was risk of harm. There was not actual harm."

That's rather like someone driving without a seatbelt claiming it's a safe thing to do because they haven't had an accident.

If you were a parent of a child needing paediatric cardiac care, would you have wanted him/her to be cared for at Bristol under Dr O' Kelly's "temporary arrangement" which did not meet CQC's Essential Standards?