Report comment

Anon 7.31 that is what the Commission for Health Improvement (CHI) did. To be fair it was a fairly intensive process but it took a range of senior and exec staff from the NHS and used them to undertake peer reviews. The additional benefit was that those peer reviewers often went back to their organisations with a completely different view of what good looked like. People who were part of a CHI review often considered it to be a really developmental approach. It was a truly outstanding organisation to be part of and I consider it to have been a privilege to have worked there.