Report comment

I don't read this as 'all parties' agreeing the data is old or flawed, but just those bodies which are likely to be defensive - the Trust itself (natch) and its erstwhile commissioner, which let the (apparently poor) service continue. And knowing the process of review as I do, the findings will be based on a rounded views of the available evidence. Once the Trust sees the areas for required improvement it can, if it is able, use more up to date data to demonstrate the better picture.