The future of funding for highly specialist treatments in various hospitals has been thrown into uncertainty after the Department of Health decided to stop providing a £62m budget that supplements it.
NHS England is set to begin discussions about the future of the budget for 2014-15.
An NHS England spokeswoman said “discussions remain open” between the DH and NHS England “as to whether this funding will be available in the future”.
HSJ understands the DH informed the 16 trusts that received a share of the fund in 2013-14 of its decision just before the end of the financial year.
A finance director at one of the trusts in receipt of the funding said the timing of the decision had not given trusts enough time to factor the cut into their budgets for 2014-15.
He said: “To be informed about this change in funding so close to the year end means that it will be very difficult for us to make the necessary changes in 2014-15 to achieve our forecast financial outturn.”
A DH spokeswoman said funding was axed because the department approach to research and development aimed to be “fair to all trusts across the country”. “This has been communicated to the relevant chief executives,” she said.
The NHS England spokeswoman said it was “still providing” some funding, while working with Monitor to improve the tariff payment system for specialist providers. She said discussions about the funding in 2014-15 would “commence shortly” and that it would “not be appropriate for us to comment further at this time”.
A spokesman representing 10 London trusts that describe their £50m share of the £62m as “Project Diamond” said they will continue to count the funding in their budgets, despite the DH’s decision.
He said: “Over the last five years the DH, and more recently NHS England, have recognised the deficiencies in the specialist tariff and have sought to remedy this by making interim funding available pending a wider review of the tariff.
“This review aims to make the tariff sufficiently sensitive to ensure that the costs of highly specialist work is properly recognised and reimbursed.”
Provider | Funding (2013-14) (£m) |
University College London Hospitals Foundation Trust | 9.6 |
Barts Health Trust | 9.1 |
Royal Brompton and Harefield Foundation Trust | 8.1 |
Imperial College Healthcare Trust | 7.7 |
Guy’s and St Thomas’ Foundation Trust | 7.7 |
Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust | 2.9 |
King’s College Hospital Foundation Trust | 2.6 |
Sheffield Teaching Hospital Foundation Trust | 2.2 |
Oxford University Hospital Trust | 2.1 |
St George’s Healthcare Trust | 2.1 |
Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust | 1.8 |
Royal Free London Foundation Trust | 1.7 |
Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust | 1.5 |
University Hospitals Birmingham Foundation Trust | 1.4 |
The Royal Marsden Foundation Trust | 1.0 |
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Trust | 0.4 |
Topics
- BARTS HEALTH TRUST
- CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- CENTRAL MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC)
- Finance
- GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST
- KING'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FT
- Monitor
- NHS England (Commissioning Board)
- North East
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
- ROYAL NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL NHS TRUST
- SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
2 Readers' comments