- Spread of specialised services across trusts relatively unchanged over the last four years, despite calls for greater consolidation
- NHS England had planned to consolidate specialised services in “centres of excellence” under previous leadership but the policy has become more nuanced
- Academy of Medical Royal Colleges says there “probably hasn’t been sufficient progress” in consolidating services
- Tables show trusts with the biggest increases and decreases in share of specialised income
The spread of specialised services across English hospital trusts has remained relatively unchanged over the last four years, despite a consensus that greater consolidation is needed in some areas.
Analysis of NHS England data by HSJ shows the distribution of spending on tertiary care was broadly similar in 2016-17 to the spread in 2013-14.
The graph below looks at the share of income received by 153 providers of acute specialised services. It excludes mental health.
Although some of the smaller providers have seen their share of income reduce, as would be expected with greater consolidation, others have seen their share increase – where the orange line spikes.
Consolidation of specialised services within trusts that run services on more than one site, which is uncommon, will not show up in the data. You can download the full data here.
Under its previous leadership, NHS England had planned to consolidate specialised services in up to 30 “centres of excellence”, saying this would improve care and save money. The medical royal colleges have also stressed the benefits of closing smaller departments.
But the national policy has been more nuanced since 2015.
In the Five Year Forward View, NHS England recognised the benefits of centralising some specialities – such as stroke, surgery and some cancer services – and chief executive Simon Stevens has referred to the “long tail of providers who are doing very few specialised services”. However, Mr Stevens and the national body have also suggested smaller hospitals can continue delivering other tertiary services if they can be supported or networked with larger providers.
Withdrawing services from hospitals is often politically difficult and unpopular with staff, but in some specialties research suggests it can save lives. There have been efforts at a national level to consolidate child heart surgery for almost 20 years, which are yet to conclude.
Analysis by HSJ in 2014 suggested around 30 per cent of specialised services in some regions failed to meet nationally defined standards. HSJ has attempted to obtain updated information on service “derogations” from NHS England but these have not yet been provided.
Alastair Henderson, chief executive of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, which made a high profile call for service consolidation in 2012, said: “There probably hasn’t been sufficient progress. It’s a hard and complex process that doesn’t tend to be popular especially in times of political uncertainty.
“We haven’t realised the benefits we could have done. The challenges remain the same, as many sustainability and transformation partnerships are finding.”
HSJ obtained the spending data from NHS England, which commissions specialised services, through a Freedom of Information request.
HSJ asked NHS England if whether it believed there should be more consolidation, and at a faster pace, or whether it felt the spread of services should remain broadly the same.
It did not answer this directly, but said in a statement: “Nuanced and sophisticated judgements are being taken on a service by service basis about the right balance between local care and concentration of expertise and equipment…
“This balance will often change over time - as happened for example with the diffusion of interventional cardiology from teaching hospitals to district general hospitals.”
It also cited stroke care, where some areas benefit from centralised hyperspecialist stroke units, while in others there are efforts being made to deliver modern treatments to a wider range of hospitals than at present - such as mechanical thrombectomy.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust is still the largest provider of specialised services, although its share of the total income has been dropping slightly. The next largest by share are; Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Health NHS Trust, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust.
Ten trusts with the biggest increase in share of total specialised income
|Trust||Specialised income 2016-17 (£m)||Specialised income 2015-16 (£m)||Share of acute sector total 2016-17 (%)||Share of acute sector total 2015-16 (%)||Percentage point increase in share|
|Cambridge University Hospitals FT||296.2||254.9||2.64||2.46||0.18|
|Barts Health Trust||420.4||371.6||3.75||3.59||0.16|
|University College London Hospitals FT||359.7||316.6||3.20||3.06||0.15|
|Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals Trust||76.7||59.2||0.68||0.57||0.11|
|University Hospital Southampton FT||308.1||275.7||2.75||2.66||0.08|
|King’s College Hospital FT||351.1||317.3||3.13||3.06||0.06|
|Royal United Hospital Bath FT||48.5||38.6||0.43||0.37||0.06|
|York Teaching Hospital FT||44.6||36.2||0.40||0.35||0.05|
|Heart of England FT||123.5||109.8||1.10||1.06||0.04|
|Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust||156.6||140.4||1.40||1.36||0.04|
NHS England said the figures do not include spending through the cancer drugs fund, and it may not agree to the positions reported in the individual provider accounts so they should be used with caution.
Ten trusts with the biggest decrease in share of total specialised income
|Name||Specialised Services Income (2016-2017) £m||Specialised Services Income (2015-2016) £m||Share of total (%) 2016-17||Share of total (%) 2015-16||Percentage point change in share|
|Royal Brompton and Harefield Foundation Trust||223.6||227.7||1.75||1.91||-0.16|
|Chelsea And Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust||123.2||124.8||0.97||1.05||-0.08|
|The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust||359.1||343.1||2.82||2.88||-0.07|
|Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust||198.7||192.9||1.56||1.62||-0.06|
|The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre Foundation Trust||82||82.9||0.64||0.70||-0.05|
|Papworth Hospital Foundation Trust||90.2||90.3||0.71||0.76||-0.05|
|Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust||322||305.8||2.53||2.57||-0.04|
|Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust||79.5||79.1||0.62||0.66||-0.04|
|Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust||307||291.3||2.41||2.45||-0.04|
|London North West Healthcare NHS Trust||68.8||68.4||0.54||0.57||-0.03|
Article has been updated to include data from dedicated specialist trusts.
- Excel, Size 30.94 kb
NHS England spending data
- Academy of Medical Royal Colleges
- Acute care
- BARKING, HAVERING AND REDBRIDGE HOSP NHS TRUST
- BARTS HEALTH TRUST
- BRIGHTON AND SUSSEX UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST
- CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- CENTRAL MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- East of England
- Finance and efficiency
- Five year forward view
- IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST
- KING'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FT
- LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST
- LONDON NORTH WEST HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST
- NHS England (Commissioning Board)
- North East
- PENNINE ACUTE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST
- ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL BATH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- SALFORD ROYAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- Simon Stevens
- South West
- Specialised commissioning
- Specialist care
- THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SOUTH MANCHESTER NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST (formerly HEFT)
- West Midlands
- YORK TEACHING HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
- Yorkshire and the Humber