Four sustainability and transformation plan regions have failed to raise mental health spending as mandated by national leaders, HSJ can reveal.
Data analysed by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, shared with HSJ, shows that mental health funding has dropped in four STP footprints as a proportion of the total allocations given to the clinical commissioning groups in each patch between 2015-16 and 2016-17.
The regions are:
- Milton Keynes, Bedfordshire and Luton: -1.55 per cent.
- Dorset: -0.76 per cent.
- Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire West: -0.28 per cent.
- Northamptonshire: -0.15 per cent.
The data comes from NHS England’s mental health dashboard, which was published last year to show how commissioners fare against finance and performance indicators.
Nine more STPs have increased their investment in mental health by less than 2 per cent and a total of 15 have done so by less than 3 per cent.
Increasing mental health spending at least in line with increases CCGs’ overall budgets is NHS England’s key measure for assessing whether commissioners are upholding the policy of “parity of esteem” for mental and physical health.
STP responses
A spokesman for Oxfordshire CCG said its proportion of mental health spending had gone down because it had not managed to match the seven per cent allocation growth for 2016-17.
He added: “In October 2015 the new mental health outcomes based contract commenced which was a negotiated agreement around improved mental health outcomes for a flat cash envelope.
“As we were only six months into this contract [in April 2016] there was no need to invest further into this. There were funding increases in out of scope of OBC mental health services but obviously this wouldn’t equate to a seven per cent uplift in total for mental health.”
James Murray, programme director for Northamptonshire STP, said: ”Based on the submitted STP in October and supporting templates, there is no intention on reducing spending on mental health in Northamptonshire”
A Dorset STP spopeswoman said: ”Dorset CC) would like to emphasise that although the percentage of our total allocation spent on mental health may have gone down, it doesn’t necessarily mean that our mental health spend has gone down. It could equally mean that we have invested heavily in another area which simply changes the proportions.”
Milton Keynes, Bedforshire and Luton STP were approached for comment.
The royal college has called for CCGs to make sure the cash promised by NHS England last year for new mental health services is used to provide them.
College president Professor Sir Simon Wessely said for the STPs to succeed, mental health funding will have to increase in line with national guidelines.
He said: “I am deeply concerned that without further dedication to mental health investment, those areas falling behind will risk losing out on future funding, and will end up in a downward spiral of worsening care for those most in need.
“I would urge that STPs use this data to take note of those areas on an upward trajectory of investment, who can share notes on how they have met the standards for mental health care investment.”
While none of the individual CCGs in the four STPs were actually decreasing their total mental health spending, the college’s analysis shows that many of them were failing to increase their spending as mandated by national guidance.
The 2017-19 planning guidance, published last September, said commissioners and providers must hit access and quality standards and increase baseline spend on mental health.
The analysis follows HSJ revealing that more than a fifth of commissioners were failing to raise their mental health budgets from 2015-16 to 2016-17 by the same percentage as their overall allocation increase.
NHS Clinical Commissioners’ mental health network chair, Phil Moore, stressed commissioners are “serious and ambitious” about improving mental health services and achieving parity of esteem but there are cases where they are under pressure to invest resources in the acute sector.
Dr Moore, who is deputy clinical chair of Kingston CCG, added: “Their commitment towards improving mental health and the investment that [CCGs] are making is real but it is a fact that they are working in an incredibly financially challenged climate.
“The range of high priority and competing demands that CCGs have on their budgets can make it difficult to deliver transformation, in spite of their clear desire to do so.”
Table: Changes in planned mental health spending by STP area
STP/CCG area (STP area in bold) | Percentage change in planned mental health spend as proportion of overall CCG allocation from 2015-16 to 2016-17 | Mental health investment standard achieved in 2016-17 |
---|---|---|
Milton Keynes, Bedfordshire and Luton | -1.55% | |
Bedfordshire | -4.21% | No |
Luton | 0.13% | No |
Milton Keynes | 2.19% | Yes |
Dorset | -0.76% | |
Dorset | -0.76% | No |
Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire West | -0.28% | |
Oxfordshire | -5.35% | No |
Ayelsbury Vale | 4.19% | Yes |
North and West Reading | 2.11% | Yes |
South Reading | 2.38% | Yes |
Newbury and District | 1.68% | Yes |
Wokingham | 2.31% | Yes |
Chiltern | 2.68% | Yes |
Northamptonshire | -0.15% | |
Corby | 1.61% | Yes |
Nene | -0.28% | Yes |
South East London | 0.90% | |
Bexley | 0.24% | No |
Bromley | 1.92% | Yes |
Greenwich | 0.91% | No |
Lambeth | 0.77% | Yes |
Lewisham | 0.55% | Yes |
Southwark | 1.56% | Yes |
Hertfordshire and West Essex | 1.10% | |
Herts Valleys | 1.61% | Yes |
West Essex | -0.82% | No |
East and North Hertfordshire | 1.57% | Yes |
North West London | 1.32% | |
Hammersmith and Fulham | 0.68% | Yes |
Brent | 2.51% | Yes |
Ealing | -4.78% | No |
Harrow | 5.31% | Yes |
Hillingdon | 3.34% | Yes |
Hounslow | 5.14% | Yes |
Central London (Westminster) | 6.25% | No |
West London | -0.46% | Yes |
Staffordshire | 1.36% | |
North Staffordshire | 4.13% | Yes |
Stafford and Surrounds | 4.25% | No |
Stoke on Trent | 0.24% | No |
Cannock Chase | 5.52% | No |
South East Staffordshire and Seisdon Peninsula | -4.95% | No |
East Staffordshire | -1.60% | No |
North Central London | 1.63% | |
Barnet | -0.81% | Yes |
Camden | 2.37% | Yes |
Islington | 1.30% | Yes |
Enfield | 5.63% | Yes |
Haringey | 0.85% | Yes |
Mid and South Essex | 1.66% | |
Thurrock | 1.96% | Yes |
Castle Point and Rochford | 8.08% | No |
Basildon and Brentwood | -1.84% | No |
Southend | 0.62% | Yes |
Mid Essex | 1.63% | Yes |
Bristol, North Somerset, South Gloucestershire | 1.73% | |
Bristol | 0.93% | Yes |
North Somerset | 2.05% | No |
South Gloucestershire | 2.94% | Yes |
Bath, Swindon and Wiltshire | 1.81% | |
Bath and North East Somerset | 5.67% | Yes |
Swindon | 0.60% | Yes |
Wiltshire | 0.68% | Yes |
Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly | 1.86% | |
Kernow | 1.86% | No |
Frimley Health | 2.01% | |
Bracknell and Ascot | 3.23% | Yes |
North East Hampshire and Farnham | 2.52% | Yes |
Slough | 1.78% | Yes |
Surrey Heath | 1.19% | Yes |
Winsor, Ascot and Maidenhead | 0.82% | Yes |
Suffolk and North East Essex | 2.42% | |
Ipswich and East Suffolk | 5.03% | Yes |
West Suffolk | 1.04% | Yes |
North East Essex | 0.24% | No |
Devon | 2.46% | |
South Devon and Torbay | 0.23% | No |
Northern, Eastern and Western Devon | 3.06% | No |
Norfolk and Waveney | 2.53% | |
North Norfolk | 1.88% | Yes |
Norwich | 1.88% | Yes |
South Norfolk | 4.23% | Yes |
Great Yarmouth and Waveney | 2.40% | Yes |
West Norfolk | 2.47% | Yes |
Kent and Medway | 2.61% | |
Ashford | 7.98% | Yes |
Canterbury and Coastal | 5.14% | Yes |
South Kent Coast | 3.20% | Yes |
Thanet | 4.95% | Yes |
Dartford, Gravesham and Swanley | 0.61% | No |
Medway | 1.00% | Yes |
West Kent | 0.86% | Yes |
Swale | 2.08% | Yes |
South West London | 2.67% | |
Croydon | 3.00% | Yes |
Kingston | 1.17% | Yes |
Merton | 2.10% | Yes |
Richmond | 2.15% | No |
Sutton | 5.22% | Yes |
Wandsworth | 2.52% | Yes |
Somerset | 3.35% | |
Somerset | 3.35% | Yes |
Surrey Heartlands | 3.44% | |
Guildford and Waverley | 4.23% | Yes |
Surrey Downs | 5.97% | Yes |
North West Surrey | 1.15% | Yes |
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough | 3.47% | |
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough | 3.47% | Yes |
West, North and East Cumbria | 3.58% | |
Cumbria (crosses 2 STPs) | 3.58% | Yes |
Northumberland, Tyne and Wear | 3.74% | |
Northumberland | 6.96% | Yes |
Newcastle and Gateshead | 0.89% | Yes |
North Tyneside | -4.47% | No |
South Tyneside | 0.34% | Yes |
Sunderland | 11.22% | Yes |
Coventry and Warwickshire | 3.78% | |
Coventry and Rugby | 1.00% | No |
Warwickshire North | -1.23% | No |
South Warwickshire | 12.31% | Yes |
Greater Manchester | 3.98% | |
Bolton | 2.86% | Yes |
Central Manchester | 2.58% | Yes |
North Manchester | 0.32% | Yes |
South Manchester | 0.07% | Yes |
Stockport | 2.93% | Yes |
Trafford | 2.36% | Yes |
Wigan Borough | 10.82% | Yes |
Oldham | 10.46% | Yes |
Salford | 3.49% | Yes |
Bury | 2.17% | Yes |
Tameside and Glossop | 2.90% | Yes |
Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale | 1.83% | Yes |
Sussex and East Surrey | 4.00% | |
Crawley | 1.61% | Yes |
East Surrey | 3.16% | No |
Brighton and Hove | 1.70% | Yes |
High Weald Lewes Havens | 11.18% | Yes |
Horsham and Mid Sussex | 0.82% | Yes |
Coastal West Sussex | 5.42% | Yes |
Eastbourne, Hailsham and Seaford | 9.72% | Yes |
Hastings and Rother | 0.53% | Yes |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw | 4.41% | |
Barnsley | 13.76% | Yes |
Doncaster | 0.69% | Yes |
Sheffield | 0.45% | No |
Bassetlaw | 0.50% | No |
Rotherham | 10.32% | Yes |
Coast, Humber and Vale | 5.30% | |
Hull | 2.11% | Yes |
North East Lincolnshire | 8.53% | Yes |
North Lincolnshire | 2.03% | Yes |
East Riding of Yorkshire | 2.52% | Yes |
Scarborough and Ryedale | 9.97% | No |
Vale of York | 8.95% | No |
Cheshire and Merseyside | 5.64% | |
Knowsley | 11.64% | Yes |
Wirral | 2.60% | Yes |
South Sefton | -0.42% | No |
Southport and Formby | 0.93% | No |
Eastern Cheshire | 1.64% | Yes |
Liverpool | 11.38% | Yes |
Halton | 10.11% | Yes |
St Helens | 11.85% | Yes |
South Cheshire | 0.12% | No |
Vale Royal | 2.18% | No |
Warrington | 0.02% | Yes |
West Cheshire | 2.37% | No |
Durham, Darlington and Tees, Hambleton, Richmondshire and Whitby | 6.22% | |
Durham Dales, Easington and Sedgefield | 12.59% | Yes |
Darlington | 2.20% | Yes |
South Tees | 2.37% | Yes |
Hambleton, Richmondshire and Whitby | 0.24% | No |
Hartlepool and Stockton-on-Tees | 1.89% | Yes |
North Durham | 12.35% | Yes |
Herefordshire and Worcestershire | 6.43% | |
Redditch and Bromsgrove | 2.16% | Yes |
South Worcestershire | 16.27% | Yes |
Wyre Forest | 0.76% | Yes |
Herefordshire | -0.12% | No |
West Yorkshire | 6.54% | |
Airedale | 2.36% | Yes |
Bradford City | 14.92% | Yes |
Bradford Districts | 11.75% | Yes |
Calderdale | 12.16% | Yes |
Greater Huddersfield | 1.13% | Yes |
Harrogate and Rural District | 15.79% | Yes |
Leeds North | 1.86% | Yes |
Leeds South and East | 0.82% | Yes |
Leeds West | -0.07% | Yes |
North Kirklees | 1.29% | Yes |
Wakefield | 13.50% | Yes |
The Black Country | 6.93% | |
Dudley | 10.89% | Yes |
Sandwell and West Birmingham | 13.86% | Yes |
Walsall | -3.81% | No |
Wolverhampton | 2.00% | Yes |
Birmingham and Solihull | 8.01% | |
Birmingham and Crosscity | 8.46% | No |
Birmingham South and Central | 13.59% | Yes |
Solihull | -0.48% | No |
Hampshire and the Isle of Wight | 8.60% | |
Fareham and Gosport | 13.32% | Yes |
Isle of Wight | 3.41% | Yes |
North Hampshire | 1.21% | Yes |
South Eastern Hampshire | 14.67% | Yes |
Southampton | 0.23% | No |
West Hampshire | 12.19% | Yes |
Portsmouth | 11.27% | Yes |
Lancashire and South Cumbria | 8.77% | |
Blackpool CCG | 14.71% | Yes |
Chorley and South Ribble | 8.94% | Yes |
Fylde and Wyre | 11.38% | Yes |
West Lancashire | 1.61% | Yes |
Blackburn with Darwen | 11.70% | Yes |
East Lancashire | 8.33% | Yes |
Lancashire North | 7.12% | Yes |
Greater Preston | 9.75% | Yes |
Cumbria (crosses 2 STPs) | 3.58% | Yes |
North East London | 10.73% | |
Barking and Dagenham | 11.67% | Yes |
City and Hackney | 1.44% | Yes |
Havering | 11.16% | Yes |
Tower Hamlets | 18.47% | Yes |
Waltham Forest | 11.51% | Yes |
Newham | 13.67% | Yes |
Redbridge | 8.02% | No |
Gloucestershire | 11.44% | |
Gloucestershire | 11.44% | Yes |
Shropshire and Telford and Wrekin | 11.93% | |
Shropshire | 12.95% | No |
Telford and Wrekin | 9.84% | Yes |
Lincolnshire | 12.01% | |
Lincolnshire East | 10.95% | No |
Lincolnshire West | 12.89% | Yes |
South Lincolnshire | 10.61% | No |
South West Lincolnshire | 14.39% | Yes |
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland | 12.43% | |
East Leicestershire and Rutland | 13.67% | Yes |
Leicester City | 12.02% | Yes |
West Leicestershire | 11.84% | Yes |
Nottinghamshire | 12.84% | |
Mansfield and Ashfield | 11.97% | Yes |
Newark and Sherwood | 10.74% | Yes |
Nottingham City | 15.21% | Yes |
Nottingham North and East | 10.45% | Yes |
Nottingham West | 10.81% | Yes |
Rushcliffe | 14.55% | Yes |
Derbyshire | 14.89% | |
Erewash | 13.70% | Yes |
Hardwick | 9.74% | Yes |
North Derbyshire | 11.41% | Yes |
Southern Derbyshire | 19.00% | Yes |
Topics
- Finance and efficiency
- Mental health
- NHS Bedfordshire CCG
- NHS Buckinghamshire CCG
- NHS Chiltern CCG
- NHS Corby CCG
- NHS Dorset CCG
- NHS England (Commissioning Board)
- NHS Luton CCG
- NHS Milton Keynes CCG
- NHS Nene CCG
- NHS Newbury and District CCG
- NHS North and West Reading CCG
- NHS Oxfordshire CCG
- NHS South Reading CCG
- NHS Wokingham CCG
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
Exclusive: Where mental health spending misses national target
- 1
Currently reading
Exclusive: Where mental health spending misses national target
- 2
3 Readers' comments