By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Maximum waits matter as much as minimum ones

Reading between the lines of the blustering, disingenuous and politically motivated government announcement banning “minimum waiting times”, a more interesting theme emerges.

A coded message is being sent to clinical commissioning groups about unacceptable practice. Most GPs would agree with the government’s line, but the Department of Health knows it may be different once they control commissioning budgets.

There are reasons why primary care trusts have been following this policy – with the full knowledge, nodding endorsement and sometimes tacit encouragement of this administration and its predecessor. It is easier to embark on another round of tedious management bashing than to suggest GPs might follow such behaviour.

Part of this unacceptable practice is restriction of competition. Remember this issue was first raised by a private provider complaining of biased commissioning. The message is: look to pluarity of provision to drive the service change which will deliver reduced costs.

An equally significant result of service pressure is revealed in Rob Findlay and Anthony McKeever’s piece about the scandal of long-waiters. Many of the PCT restrictions are for “low value” procedures, but some long-waiters have life-threatening and/or limiting conditions.

Waiting time management measures sometimes conspire to drive patients into this waiting limbo and safeguards such as the NHS constitution have little effect. The government has now pledged itself to act.

This is very good news. For many waiting over a year, it can feel as if they have been forgotten too. The authors offer a practical, low cost solution to targeting the longest waits. We commend it to Richmond House.

Readers' comments (4)

  • I still believe the DH needs to do MORE to drive down, and hold down, waiting times.
    Many, like me, believed that adding 18 weeks to the NHS constitution would make it an absolute standard (and maximum) - but because of lack of visibility and consequence it hasn't made a difference.

    I am hopeful that this latest round of clarifications will help...

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • given waiting time for treatment is such a pressing concern for people, and a growing problem - why does the HSJ not focus on it more regularly and forcibly?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • anon 12.42
    Not sure which HSJ you'[ve been reading, but waiting times have been a pretty regular feature of reportage recently. An have you checked out the frankly excellent Waiting List Guru stuff on the HSJ website ?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Thanks Dr, the waiting times guru information is very comprehensive.
    Perhaps I'm just looking / hoping for someone to take a firm stance on this, shouldn't we be pushing for lower waits?.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related images

Sign up for HSJ's email newsletters

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

Sign up to get the latest health policy news direct to your inbox