By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.

Close

Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust

GPs suggest 'radical' approach for Mid Staffs future

STRUCTURE: GPs in Staffordshire have proposed a “radical” approach to service provision at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust.

HSJ Local newsletters
Get the latest health headlines in your region sent direct to your inbox

Choose your HSJ local newsletters now

The news came as it emerged the organisation has received a £21m bailout to tide it over until the end of the financial year.

The chairs of Stafford and Surrounds and Cannock Chase clinical commissioning groups, Steven Powell and Johnny McMahon respectively, recommend the trust provides just four specialties across its two sites: diagnostics, outpatients, a midwife led maternity unit and an urgent care centre.

They fear Mid Staffordshire’s projection of an £11.4m deficit by 2014-15 is optimistic and say £15m savings are required to avoid the “slow death” of Stafford Hospital.

“The health economy has been charged with ‘thinking the unthinkable’ and we feel that as future commissioners we have a duty to take this requirement seriously,” they say in a letter to Graham Irwin, chief executive of the Staffordshire primary care trust cluster.

The trust’s own plan for its future viability, which included a 40 per cent reduction in beds, was rejected by the Department of Health last autumn as it showed an £11.4m annual deficit by 2014-15. A revised plan was due to go to Monitor and the DH by the end of January but HSJ understands it has not yet been agreed.

Papers due to go to the trust’s board today show it is forecasting a year-end deficit of £20.7m against a planned £18m. The papers reveal the trust has “secured” £16m in cash support for 2011-12.

HSJ understands a total support package of £21m was agreed with the DH at the end of January, with £5m of this being paid back to the DH as public dividend capital payments. This total is significantly less than the £40m the trust wanted to see it through to the end of 2012-13. However, the DH has promised further “cash support” over the next three years.

In their letter the CCG chairs complain commissioners have effectively bailed out the trust for the past two years with above-tariff payments. They also criticise a “lack of leadership” from the trust.

The letter suggests outpatient services could be run on a “satellite” basis by neighbouring acute trusts, with urgent care delivered by primary care providers. Other services currently provided by the trust could be delivered either in the community or at neighbouring acute providers.

A spokeswoman for the Staffordshire PCT cluster said it understood the GPs were frustrated by an “apparent lack of progress” but any changes would be subject to full public consultation.

Readers' comments (4)

  • "any changes would be subject to full public consultation"

    no contribution without consultation!

    will this be quick or will there be “apparent lack of progress”

    seems likely the latter

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Two observations:

    1. Deficit of >12% of turnover.
    2. Lowest Hospital Standardised mortality of any of the 15 hospital trusts across the West Midlands in 2010/11.

    Great that GPs are prepared to think the unthinkable, but are they able to produce (or commission) an evidence-based future proof financial and activity modelled service reconfiguration that sorts the money without throwing the baby out with the bath water.

    That is the real stuff of commissioning.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Break it up. We need to see how this will all work in the new world. Congratulations to the GP commissioners in bringing some realism to the debate.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Its time to face the harsh and sad reality, its time Stafford General was closed for good. the culture is malignent, and the prognosis for its treatment poor.

    Robert Francis' volumes I and II are clear about the problems.

    Its time to cut the dead wood out and start again with the new commission groups being truly innovative and patient centered.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

Sign up to get the latest health policy news direct to your inbox