By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Andrew Lansley attacks Alan Johnson

Shadow health secretary Andrew Lansley attacked Alan Johnson in a speech to the Royal Society for Arts yesterday, accusing him of neglecting his responsibilities as health secretary.

Alan Johnson’s recent comments on the need for electoral reform have led to speculation that he covets the Labour leadership. Mr Lansley said: “Instead of driving through key reforms in the NHS, Alan Johnson’s been eyeing up another job. And the NHS is suffering as a result. It’s incredibly frustrating.”

He said Mr Johnson’s “lack of progress” on the reforms introduced by former prime minister Tony Blair and former health secretary Alan Milburn were “doing real harm to our NHS”.

He said Mr Johnson and prime minister Gordon Brown had neglected or stalled progress on the four Blairite drivers of reform in the NHS, which the Conservatives had supported. The primary care strategy published last year had created newspaper headlines that people would be able to choose their GP, he said. “But when you looked at the detail, it rang hollow,” as GPs would still have fixed practice boundaries.

Choice of hospital had also stalled, with only 46 per cent of patients experiencing choice. This stalling of the choice agenda was aided by the government rolling back on its earlier commitment to open up the NHS to competition. The extension of the independent sector treatment centres programme had been cancelled and the policy behind it “went into reverse” as the health secretary had said private sector involvement was primarily about providing extra capacity, not competition.

Practice based commissioning was in effect “pointless”, Mr Lansley claimed, as GPs held only notional rather than the real cash budgets a Conservative government would give them. GPs were also unable to reinvest savings or negotiate and hold contracts. That undermined a key driver of reform as GPs had the power to force hospitals to improve standards by refusing to refer patients to poor performers.

The fourth driver – foundation trusts – had also stalled, he claimed, with the government missing its own 2008 target for all acute trusts to become foundations.

Mr Lansley warned that life under a Conservative government “won’t be easy” for the NHS, and pointed out that NHS chief executive David Nicholson had already said efficiency savings would need to reach up to £20bn by 2014. In addition to this, demands on the NHS would increase, with the ageing population and increasing life expectancies of people with chronic diseases.

“The NHS cannot successfully respond to this unless we root out waste. Unless we get rid of the underlying inefficiencies that mean patients do not always get the treatment they deserve.”

But he said a Conservative government would ask the public to take more responsibility for lifestyle choices that create unsustainable demands on the NHS.

“All of us need to face up to what’s behind so much of the demand on the NHS, and start to take responsibility for improving such things as our diet, activity levels and alcohol use,” Mr Lansley said.

But he said a focus on personal responsibility would not be at the expense of the equity of a tax funded universal system. “There is no greater expression of collective responsibility, of our duty to our fellow citizens, than the NHS. Collectively we are committed to pay for, look after, and care for the frail and the sick in our society, regardless of their circumstances. That is something of which I think we should all be proud. I am determined that future generations will also be supported by the NHS.”

Readers' comments (3)

  • Alan Johnson is extremely complacent which was reflected is his responses to the Stafford Hospital crisis. The failures listed by Andrew Lansley will only result in frustration for NHS users. I must say, also, that choose and book has worked well for me.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Paul Tovey

    Roger Fox (above) is right . There was complacency by Alan Johnson re: the Mid Staffs deaths and I believe it was concealing of the political aspect of justifiable blame for Govt's pressured driving through of the so called structural reforms in health (FT Status)

    I cannot agree that Foundation Trusts are a good way forwards since they conceal the clevered up way they shave off money from rationed patient care to make surpluses "for the benefit of patients" .... Inside out though is the new fashion .. And yeah , right-side-up is upside down in the mind of Boards and FT management - its quite mad. ..Disorientated "logic"...But boomeranging finances so they hit you back while looping the loop is a wonderful display - unless you need patient care .

    I think the UK and FT Boards are inside a moral scamdemic called "Head-in-bottomitis" - its a terrible social syndrome you know its symptoms are social coating of a bubble like mentality that looks transparent but burns your nose if you bang into it ...


    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Practice based commissioning has to be one of the greatest 'cons' perpetrated by this government on primary care. We as GPs are exhausted and fed up with the amount of time and effort we have put into this for so little achievement. The probelm is that it seems to focus mainly on 'process' at the expencce of substance. ie a lot of time is spent at meetings grappling with administration, budgets, incompetent PCT staff and non cooperating GPs. There has been a bunch of enthusiasts out there but their energy has been squandered and there are precious few to take their place. Most GPs take the management allowance and do the absolute minimum to get through. The government then can declare that the majority of GPs support PBC. The Audit office or NHS equivalent should check out what has been achieved and whether it is worth the expence of time and money. 95% GPs don;t think it is.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Share this

Post a comment

Related images

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

Sign up to get the latest health policy news direct to your inbox