By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.

Close

Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

Commissioning board chair: liberation of the NHS 'won't happen overnight'

The health service should not expect a “sudden overnight change on 1 April next year” to an autonomous and liberated system, the chair of the NHS Commissioning Board has told HSJ.

Malcolm Grant made the comments in his first interview since taking up the post at the independent board six months ago.

Professor Grant said the board had to create a “transformatively different” reformed service at the same time as meeting the “challenge of trying to bring £20bn cost reductions through the NHS” and maintaining performance.

He said: “Running two systems in parallel is very risky. We don’t want to lose any momentum on QIPP [the NHS’s quality, innovation, productivity and prevention programme] or any of the achievements of the present system while we bring in the new. [The change] will not be overnight, it is not that suddenly the lights are going to go off on 1 April and a whole new sunlight will be turned on. It’s going to be a long process of really hard work.”

The board’s chief executive Sir David Nicholson has taken a rigorously controlled top-down approach to management of the service – which he has described as “grip” – during the transition.

Professor Grant said he believed that was appropriate because of the need to make huge efficiency savings.

However, he claimed this “grip” would have to loosen and the ability of leaders transferring from the current system to change their “behaviour” was a “fundamental question” for the new NHS.

He said: “We have a lot of the same people but it doesn’t necessarily follow they [will] behave in the same way. You cannot behave in the same way. The model is no longer capable of being one of top-down
organisation.”

Professor Grant – who is still also provost of University College London – said: “If [the new system] is not different and transformatively different then we are wasting our time.”

But he said: “It will not be a sudden overnight change on 1 April next year… We are dealing with human beings and human beings have habits. The critical thing will be leadership and ensuring we have got the best team nationally, and also the strongest teams in our regional and local offices.”

HSJ’s interview was conducted after the health secretary declared his first “priorities” for the board in a letter sent to Professor Grant on Friday. Andrew Lansley said its “overarching objective” was that it “transfers power to local organisations”.

The letter said the board should follow a philosophy of “assumed liberty” for CCGs, as opposed to “earned autonomy”.

Responding to this, Professor Grant told HSJ: “We make the assumption of liberty but of course we have a responsibility to provide a comprehensive health service, and for that we do have powers of intervention.”

Another instruction in the letter was that the board should “maximise the number [of CCGs] that can be authorised fully, without conditions, by April 2013”.

The commissioning board has previously indicated requirements may be asked of many CCGs when they are authorised. These could include withholding part of their budget, telling them to employ specific managers for support, or requiring them to improve plans for a particular area.

Professor Grant told HSJ that although many emerging CCGs were already “hugely impressive”. He added that “in some parts of the country things are still some distance from that point”.

He said he would “be disappointed” if the proportion of CCGs authorised was not “very close to 100 per cent”.

However, in relation to authorisation conditions, he said: “Conditions will be variable. There may be some who are authorised with relatively marginal conditions and some who may need to be authorised with rather more intrusive conditions.”

Readers' comments (6)

  • in the patch where I work CCGs expect free rein from 1/4/13 and will not have any sympathy wiith the idea that "human beings have habits" - once they realise the requirements the NCB will undoubtedly make of them they are likely to disengage pretty fast

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • The Big Beast is being asked by his chairman and the SoS to 'loosen his grip' but at the same time carry the can if it all goes to pot .... sounds like trouble is brewing...

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Another example of a word being used outside its present meaning. None of my dictionaries or my thesaurus define " liberating" to mean the reality of what will really happen. Andrew Lansley's letter to the NHSCB outlines the implemetation of the mandate to come. I wonder why the full content of the first joint meeting has not been published or I am I just being cynical? Time will tell.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • phil kenmore

    It is encouraging to see Malcolm Grant acknowledging the need for a different style and approach to leadership in the service for new and changing times - as have many other senior NHS leaders. He is describing a process of culture change which begins with leaders adopting new 'habits.' In reality such significant cutlure change can take c18 months to 3 years and both those supporting and critiquing the change should in theory bear that in mind.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Another leadership pronouncement from another public sector apparatchnik while so many others are being put out of work. Lovely.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • liberation won't happen overnight, the retirement of the NHS at 65 needs careful planning and will take time, but it is happening

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

Sign up to get the latest health policy news direct to your inbox