By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Rise in number of hospital infections

More people than ever picked up infections while spending time in hospitals last year, it has been reported.

The number of hospital-acquired infections has doubled from 22,488 to 42,712 in just two years, the Daily Mail said.

The figures, from the NHS Information Centre, refer to all infections including superbugs MRSA and Clostridium difficile, plus others such as norovirus and E.coli.

Most of those who are affected by them are elderly, which means that their chances of recovery are very limited.

Meanwhile the Health Protection Agency (HPA) has said there havebeen 46 outbreaks of suspected norovirus in hospitals over the past two weeks, with 26 of these (57%) leading to ward closures or restrictions to admissions.

Seventeen of the cases, which occurred between 12 and 25 December, were then confirmed as cases of norovirus following laboratory tests.

Since the beginning of October, there have been 244 outbreaks reported, with 153 (63 per cent) leading to ward closures, and 125 (51 per cent) being confirmed as norovirus outbreaks following laboratory tests.

The HPA said the levels were within seasonal norms.

Earlier this month the Department of Health said the number of NHS beds closed due to norovirus-type symptoms has doubled within a week but was still within expected levels.

Its data for England showed that the average number of beds closed per day more than doubled from 720 to 1,545 between the weeks ending 11 December and 18 December.

Wards are closed in NHS hospitals as part of steps to control the highly contagious virus and stop it spreading between patients.

It is known to spread rapidly in closed environments such ashospitals, schools and nursing homes.

Symptoms include sudden vomiting, diarrhoea or both, atemperature, headache and stomach cramps.

The bug usually goes away within a few days.

Although people can suffer from norovirus at any time of the year, activity increases in the winter months, with most cases seen between October and April.

John Harris, an HPA epidemiologist specialising in norovirus, said: “Because the virus is highly contagious once it is in a hospital, closing wards to reduce the spread is often necessary and we commonly see this measure introduced at this time of the year.

“Hospitals should have a plan in place for managing an outbreak of norovirus and their infection control team will implement strict measures in order to help prevent the virus from spreading to other wards or departments in the hospital.”

The Department of Health said the figures were “misleading”.

“Because we are not complacent, we have introduced mandatory reporting of more hospital infections,” said a spokesman.

“That means that we have shone a light on the problems previously swept under the carpet. But patients should be confident that the measures we have taken will continue the downward trend in hospital infections.”

Readers' comments (4)

  • The number of infections has risen due to the gretaer sensitivity of the testing now used a point the Daily Mail would not be interested in.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • This issue was highlighted in the National Audit Offices third report on this issue in 2009 which concluded that the focus on MRSA and C Diff was not addressing the wider problem as other equally serious infections, reported under the HPAs voluntary reporting scheme were increasing year on year. The report and subsequent report by the Committee of Public Accounts highlighted some of the actions that were needed to tackle this issue with the former drawing on the advice and guidance of an expert panel. One key issue is hospital prescribing of antibiotics which many hospitals have failed to tackle. MRSa and CDiff were only tackled by trusts when the CEO was made personally and legally accountable for reducing them but few trusts bothered to monitor other infections simply because they didn't have to. If the patient wa truly being put first this would not be the case . Unless there is a real culture change this problem will persist.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • DoH report this as "misleading...." watch this space - Open and transparent data sharing & information availability will result in more media reports and more defensive responses from the DoH.

    Let the fun begin.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Infection control now a personal performance target for Trust Chairs...

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Share this

Post a comment

Related images

Sign up to get the latest health policy news direct to your inbox