Why wait for the Francis report? Here are 10 things to do now
The health service is in stasis while it waits for the Mid Staffordshire inquiry findings, says Don Redding. He presents an alternative
Whatever happened to patient safety? Throughout the government’s reforms, and despite the challenge created by its abolition of the National Patient Safety Agency, this has been one of the quietest areas of policy discussion.
Is that because, for a large part of 2012, national organisations have sat with their feet braced against the collision expected from Robert Francis’ inquiry report into Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust?
This report, covering everything from board reorganisation to frontline care to regulation, has been looked to for the “next set of instructions” on how the system should manage safety. But “waiting for Francis” has become like waiting for Godot − anticipated publication dates in April and October have now come and gone.
We need a concerted drive towards creating an open and compassionate culture in all care providers
To fill the gap, National Voices, a coalition of health and social care charities in England, has released its own “not the Francis report” urging an end to the paralysis. Evidence is mounting of systematic deficiencies in the way our services are designed and run − and we already know what to do about most of these.
Key actions
Indeed, the NHS Confederation has welcomed our report, stating that what patients want is also what NHS leaders want. So here are some thoughts on the top 10 actions that can be taken now.
- This year’s review of the NHS constitution shows it has had too little impact. We need a concerted drive towards creating an open and compassionate culture in all care providers, underpinned by accountability for upholding the NHS constitution.
- The constitution’s “pledge” towards openness when things go wrong is too often dishonoured by a defensive NHS. We must go further and have a statutory duty of candour.
- “Listening to patients” has already been a theme of earlier reports into Mid Staffordshire and will surface again. It is time to revive the ambition of NHS trusts having systematic, comprehensive and frequent patient experience measurement − with results reported at all levels of management. This is primarily for quality improvement but means poor care will have no hiding place. Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust is a pathfinder here, receiving 25,000 patient views a year. The crude “friends and family test” is a backward step for trusts like this, and should not be relied on by the NHS.
It is time to invest in patient leadership as we do in managerial and professional leadership
- The new duties on commissioners to promote the involvement of each patient in decisions should be the start of a concerted effort to stop talking about the “no decision about me, without me” slogan and start delivering it in frontline services.
- Patients can be leaders, too, supporting other patients and service users, speaking out on their behalf, and helping to design services and hold them to account. It is time to invest in patient leadership as we do in managerial and professional leadership.
- Some hospital services need radical reorganisation, where safety and quality demand a greater concentration. The NHS has a poor record when it comes to making a good case for change, involving communities and winning support. Some important changes have been ducked for decades. National Voices has agreed to work with key system leaders on a methodology for doing this well, ensuring communities have a voice and that concerns are properly addressed.
Bringing managers or healthcare assistants into regulation would be a wrong-headed response
- Within hospitals, urgent work is needed to ensure that safety and quality in hospitals do not vary according to how old the patient is or when they are admitted. The current variability is unethical and scandalous. Trust boards should be held accountable for how well they reduce these gaps. Action is needed to implement the recommendations of the Royal College of Physicians’ Hospitals on the Edge report, to improve continuity of care within hospitals; and the Delivering Dignity agenda
- Making hospitals safer also requires an uplift in the quality and organisation of out of hospital care. Coordinated care (integration) is a must-do. We need to establish high-quality full-service, community-based care. The key elements are: preventive services; care planning and named care coordinators to help vulnerable people to live well and avoid unnecessary hospital admissions; and joining up health and social care services. Good out-of-hours care and round the clock crisis support are essential.
- Implement Dilnot. Enough said.
- Do not focus too much on extending regulation. It has an important but limited role. Bringing managers and/or healthcare assistants into regulation would be a wrong-headed response.
Let us not keep repeating the Beckettian dialogue: “Let’s go.” “We can’t.” “Why not?” “We’re waiting for Francis.”
Don Redding is director of policy at National Voices
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment.






Readers' comments (3)
Anonymous | 8-Nov-2012 5:39 pm
Reviews such as Francis are often a delaying tactic anyway to allow those implicated to retire gracefully rather than be disgraced out of office. This happens at a lower level within trusts as well.
The author is right - if you see a snake, shoot the snake, dont wait 24 months for the reptologists report
Unsuitable or offensive?
roger kline | 8-Nov-2012 9:14 pm
Don several of your points are absolutely fine and well made.
However you grossly under-estimate the scale of the challenge, the resistance from Ministers, the shortcomings of too many "stakeholders" and the impact of fragmentation and privatisation. Not enough to dismiss regulation of managers and healthcare assistants as "wrong headed" without saying why. We need more focus on workforce and management culture or we'll hit the buffers
In shameless self promotion I am happy to share more detail on why I am pessimistic at http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/9412/
Unsuitable or offensive?
Clare Hardie | 15-Jan-2013 2:01 pm
The key tool in transforming the health service will be the service users themselves.
A regulatory overhaul may well be necessary, training regimes might have to be completely redesigned, and the relationship between Whitehall and the NHS may have to be re-examined.
But if patients aren’t given a genuinely powerful voice, the benefits of such fundamental changes will be diluted at best.
Healthwatch England goes live in April and it will be a big step forward in dealing with what is a national problem.
Healthwatch will be an independent consumer champion with real teeth. Crucially, it will be set up, run and delivered locally, and those local groups will have statutory powers to see health and social care services being delivered first hand and they will have a seat on the Health and Wellbeing Board. Local Healthwatch will be able to make recommendations, and providers have to respond to those recommendations.
Staffordshire more than anywhere in the country deserves a really effective Healthwatch – a Rolls Royce of a Healthwatch.
This is why we have set up Engaging Communities Staffordshire – we will deliver a Healthwatch plus that goes beyond the standard local Healthwatch and brings in income from other sources in order to plough back resources into making Healthwatch Staffordshire a beacon for ensuring health and social care services are shaped by those that use them.
DH guidelines state that local Healthwatch should be run by a social enterprise that puts at least 50% of its profit back into its main community purpose – Engaging Communities Staffordshire is committed to putting 100% of any profits it generates back into giving the residents of Staffordshire a standard bearer of a local Healthwatch.
ECS is a standalone, independent organisation, and we are absolutely determined to give the county’s residents a real say in how almost all publicly-procured services are delivered.
As part of that we will help member organisations collect and analyse feedback, carry out consultations and then, for the first time, we will be able to see the bigger picture of service provision as a whole.
I would urge providers, commissioners and users of services in Staffordshire to get behind ECS. I’m convinced it will become the template for similar organisations across the country.
I’m also convinced it will help stamp out unacceptable standards of care.
Robin Morrison, Chair of Engaging Communities Staffordshire
Unsuitable or offensive?