Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Your browser is not accepting cookies. This means means you will have to log in each time you visit the site.
For the best experience of, please enable cookies.

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Healthy teams lead to healthy cultures

There are plenty of positive examples across the NHS of the kind of supportive, compassionate and high quality culture and care that must become the norm, says Michael West

Times have been tough in NHS of late. The service has experienced the biggest structural earthquake in its history and has taken a sustained public battering from many sides. Ironically this is all after a period of major improvements in services, such as reduced waiting times and treating heart disease.

‘The most outstanding trusts and their boards are already nurturing the cultures needed to provide high quality, improving care’

NHS staff continue to suffer among the highest stress levels of any in the UK working population and public confidence has been undermined by the sustained criticism of the service. Yet the NHS is a service that is admired around the world.

Because of the intense focus on the NHS, there is an opportunity to nurture a rapid and healthy change in culture across the service. This cultural change must include the Care Quality Commission, Monitor, clinical commissioning groups and NHS England because they powerfully influence cultures across the service.

Their cultures must be shaped to be supportive, developmental, appreciative and visionary by their leaders. Regulation methods should reflect this to support the diffusion of good practice and the development of healthy cultures. The Keogh review provided a fine template for the approach while not losing the sharpness necessary for decisive intervention.

Clare priorities

The most outstanding trusts and their boards are already nurturing the cultures needed to provide high quality, compassionate and continuously improving care. Lancaster University Management School’s research offers evidence based prescriptions for how to achieve this.

‘The best trusts avoid “priority thickets” − so many priorities and initiatives from higher levels that frontline staff are simply besieged’

We found the best boards go beyond merely articulating a vision and ensure that they and their leadership community embody the vision through their work. It is what they focus on, monitor, reward and reinforce in their daily activities. They also clarify their five or six improvement objectives as a team, defining how they will uniquely improve their assistance to their trusts to achieve the vision. And they recognised that if quality is not improving, it is getting worse so continuous improvement in care is a central concern for all staff.

These trusts ensure all directorates, departments, teams and individuals have clear, challenging and measurable annual improvement objectives that include care quality as the top priority. They replicate this clarity at every level of the organisation, ensuring through this disciplined approach that staff are not confronted by what we called “priority thickets” − so many priorities and initiatives cascaded from higher levels that frontline staff are simply besieged.

Being the best

The best are excellent at listening to the experiences of patients and the views of staff. These are not box ticking approaches that prioritise bureaucratic compliance with external requirements, but vigorous and sustained methods of gathering rich, in-depth views from both patients and staff.

They use the data they collect intelligently and feed the knowledge back into the system and to frontline staff so that improvement and innovation are guided.

Every day the vast majority of NHS staff strive to deliver the highest quality of care but we saw some fall woefully short − usually in cultures characterised by “command and control” toxicity and internecine conflict that sapped emotional resources.

‘Abusive, aggressive, arrogant and disruptive behaviours should be called out immediately and poor performance managed’

In the best trusts we noted an implicit recognition that if staff are to treat patients with compassion, respect, dignity and professionalism, leaders and managers and staff must treat each other with compassion, respect, dignity and professionalism. National staff survey data clearly bear this out.

Such interactions become culturally contagious. In the best, staff were valued, supported and, above all, when they identified barriers to quality care, they were carefully listened to. And systems difficulties were confronted. And the leadership collectively agreed that abusive, aggressive, arrogant and disruptive behaviours should be called out immediately and poor performance managed, no matter how senior the individuals concerned.

Team tactics

The best trusts we studied across the country have embraced team based working focused on delivering high quality, compassionate care that is consistently improving and working supportively across professional boundaries. Status and professional identity are not barriers to effective team working because there is a widespread commitment to the trust vision and inter-professional respect and valuing. Every team has its objectives and the intent to improve the effectiveness with which they work with other teams in the organisation.

We found these trusts had positive, optimistic cultures where there was a strong commitment to work cooperatively, supportively, cohesively and transparently. There was a commitment by leaders across these trusts to create a culture of high quality, improving care characterised by compassion − taking notice, responding empathically and taking intelligent action to help.

Many trusts we studied are working towards achieving such cultures. Monitor, CCGs, the CQC, NHS England and all those responsible for safeguarding our health services at this time of change and opportunity should do so too.

Michael West is professor of organisational psychology at Lancaster University Management School

Readers' comments (2)

  • "leaders and managers and staff must treat each other with compassion, respect, dignity and professionalism"

    This pretty much identifies the real problem - all these titles are NHS staff. The divide is artificial.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If only the Board, leaders and managers treat both staff and patients with kindness, compassion, humanity dignity respect and do the right thing for both patients and staff then NHS would be much better.

    Fundamental problem is NHS is good culture and leadership is patchy. Bullying, victimisation, discrimination, club culture, Old Boys' network and tolerating poor practice and poor behaviours are too common. Sadly this is due to lack of true leaders not simply at the level of the Board but also underneath the Board. Good managers and good leaders everywhere who promote good culture and create good energy is what we need.

    Even good doctors and nurses become bad or indifferent in a bad culture. Bad doctors become good or leave or removed in a good system. NHS must be for the patients, by the patients and with the patients and we need good leaders who always put patients at the heart of everything they do and anything else must be secondary. Recently met nearly 300 BME doctors in 5 different events who told me they are absolutely scared to talk about patient safety! This is simply shocking and two of these doctors come from 14 Keogh Trusts!

    How do we protect patients if there is fear amongst consultants and GPs? If consultants feel like this then what hopes we have juniors raising concerns about safety?

    NHS must appointe leaders for the right reasons and they should be appointed only on merit and not because of race, religion, club or gender.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Submission of any material is governed by our terms and conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.