By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


CCGs confident but still deliver a kick to the regions

HSJ’s second Barometer survey of those leading clinical commissioning groups reveals the new organisations are still full of confidence as they get ready to take full responsibility for £60bn of NHS cash in April.

There are signs they are growing more aware of the likely impact of financial constraint on their ability to ensure service quality. However, the belief CCGs will begin to improve health services relatively quickly remains as rock solid as it was in the first survey last autumn.

The one noticeable trend between the two snapshots is the sign of growing tension between CCGs and the NHS Commissioning Board. In the autumn, 14 per cent of respondents identified lack of support from the board as a “significant barrier” to becoming an effective organisation. In the latest survey, that number has risen to 20 per cent. The problem appears to lie mainly not with the board’s HQ or the local area teams, but with its regional arms.

‘Sir David Nicholson will not be happy to hear that CCGs are “still fixated on feeding the beast”’

One in five CCG leads said the relationship with their regional team was “unhelpful, very unhelpful or bullying”. This concern appears to be partly linked to the delays in confirming staff arrangements which will hopefully disappear once what a respondent referred to as the “stultifying process of transition” is completed.

More worrying is the sign that bad old habits are resurfacing. Board chief executive Sir David Nicholson told HSJ that he wants a system very different from the existing arrangements in which local organisations decide their own destinies and were not constantly waiting for regional and national sign-off.

He will not be happy to hear that CCGs are “still fixated on feeding the beast and assuring everyone that plans are delivering and that there are improvement plans in place and the money is sorted” or that “every layer seems to need to know whatever it feels it needs to know ‘urgently’, and demands information through multiple routes”.

There also appears little chance of change while, as one respondent puts it: “Performance management by PCT cluster/local area team replicates the unhelpful way the strategic health authority always did it and the regional national commissioning board director is back to being as awful as they always used to be.”

Readers' comments (3)

  • As soon as we've got this transition sorted, abolish the regional teams. The resource they soak up is desperately needed in other areas and we remove a tier of management. Then let the ATs get on with developing a meaningful partnership with their local CCGs without the continual need to satisfy demands for information which serve no purpose but to reassure.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Wow, 20% already and there are still 6 weeks to vesting day.

    Unsuitable or offensive?


    No comment here about Specialised Commissioning being the responsibility of Area Teams.

    Be curious to see how much tension arises between Area Teams and CCGs should the law of unintended consequences give rise to increased specialist centres referrals. To this add the perception that the centre is helping itself to an overly large wedge of money - which could further exacerbate tension.

    A path edged with brambles & nettles to navigate - there will be plenty of snags ahead.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

Sign up to get the latest health policy news direct to your inbox