Leaders can help detoxify the BMA strike
Despite lurid headlines, sensible contingency planning by hospitals and GP practices looks like significantly reducing the impact of Thursday’s strike by doctors.
The British Medical Association, mindful of public opinion, is bending over backwards to be seen to ensure no one is endangered by the action.
The greater threat is to relationships between NHS staff. The striking doctors have a large number of supporters among NHS staff but there are also those, within the profession and outside, who feel they are betraying patients and/or making a tactical mistake in negotiations with government.
Both support and concern are running as an undercurrent throughout the NHS. However, if the strike is perceived as having harmed patients or especially if the action continues these emotions will become more overt. The legacy of industrial action is often long-running grudges that increasingly become more harmful than the original dispute.
There will be a tendency to relax after Thursday’s disruption has ceased. However, NHS leaders at all levels should be on guard for tensions the strike might have created. They will be able to do little about its root cause, but in rallying all behind the shared mission to deliver quality care they will help draw some of the dispute’s poison from the NHS’s bloodstream.
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment.
Share
Readers' comments (3)
Anonymous | 20-Jun-2012 10:55 am
tactical mistake?
you mean fundamental strategic error surely...
Unsuitable or offensive?
Patrick Newman | 20-Jun-2012 2:42 pm
Experience has shown that this lot will simply come back for more if a stand is not taken. Doctors may not be the most deserving case but there are real issues that need to be recognised and it is a common enemy that all public sector workers are facing.
Unsuitable or offensive?
Anonymous | 21-Jun-2012 2:48 pm
Shouldn't we non-doctors in the NHS stand behind the BMA so that any of us have a chance of retaining the current (recently reviewed) pension arrangements?
I can't understand why GPs/GP leaders aren't threatening to withdraw support for CCGs as the Health Bill would be dead in the water without GPs stepping up to find the £20,000,000,000 in efficiency savings (albeit over 3 years).
Unsuitable or offensive?