How productivity and efficiency benefit from focusing on utilisation
The NHS stands to make huge efficiency savings from better productivity practices if it begins to focus on the underutilisation of its resources, argues Dr Angus MacDougall.
There has been much reported in the media of NHS staff being asked to sacrifice their annual leave in order to avoid the financial precipice that the NHS is currently teetering towards. This issue is compounded further by challenging winter months and problematic peak holiday seasons.
This was an unprecedented and somewhat desperate move by the sector, which could suggest that the NHS is losing its way. With more and more trusts facing financial peril, there is a requirement as never before to find new ways to increase productivity and drive out costs.
“Improving utilisation would allow the NHS to make the £20bn ‘Nicholson challenge’ look like small beer”
However a common complaint across the NHS is that cost cutting and efficiencies are looked for in the wrong places. It is clear time is running out and that trusts need to focus in the right places and at the right level to release the financial pressures.
Focusing on cost savings from the macro level is like sailing a boat with a map but no rudder, while focusing at the micro level means that your small boat is no match for the strong tide you are trying to sail against. So at what level should trusts focus their cost saving activities?
I am going to make a bold prediction. At any one time in the NHS, a significant proportion of NHS resources, say theatre space, clinical rooms or MRI scanners, are not being used. This underutilisation could be as much as 20 per cent. Improving this would allow the NHS to smash the Nicholson challenge and make the required £20bn savings over three years look like small beer.
But why are these resources not being used? The answer is straightforward – poor organisation and lack of transparency at the level of staff and resources. Consultants are the main drivers of clinical activity in a hospital. Overall productivity in the trust is reduced when their work is not organised to maximise the use of the hospital’s resources.
Further to this, consultant activity will determine the activity of other worker groups such as nurses, junior doctors and allied health professionals. When information about consultant activity is not transparent and updated quickly the allocated staff and resources are wasted when they could have been deployed in other areas. So poor resource utilization results in a double hammer blow of reduced productivity and wasted costs.
What is required is advanced planning, with the production of clear rosters to give full oversight of which doctors are available at any given time. In the past, managing staff availability and scheduling treatment was often considered a time consuming task and a diversion from patient care. However, advances in technology have not only transformed these processes, they have also led to immense efficiency gains.
Modernisation is clearly the cornerstone of reform in this area. NHS trusts have to be realistic about what can be achieved with outdated technology and paper-based processes. If efficiency and cost reduction is the end goal, it’s time to equip staff with the means to achieve more with fewer resources.
With a move by some trusts to focus on organising their staff rosters specifically around the use of their resources, this approach will, I believe, drive much greater productivity gains.
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment.






Readers' comments (3)
Anonymous | 10-Feb-2012 11:22 am
If you have missed the point, he is writing about E-Rostering. This electronic tools promises much and it will frighten many who have been working below par. It might go someway to explaining why so many of the clinical bodies have decided to oppose the BILL. For if it gets royal approval E-Rostering will be everywhere and even consultants will not be able to hid !
Unsuitable or offensive?
Cassander | 10-Feb-2012 12:57 pm
An interesting article, but surely focused on treating symptoms rather than the underlying cause? The NHS needs to look at reducing demand rather than constantly increasing supply.
It's a hard ask; there are intelligent people employed full-time to devise ways of persuading others to eat more fat and drink more sugar. An upsurge in the popularity of tracksuits has perversely coincided with a slump in physical activity. The medicalisation of old age has added years to life, but these are often lived in the company of incurable disease.
Reducing demand on the NHS will be difficult, but the current pressures cannot be solved by efficiency or productivity alone.
Unsuitable or offensive?
sjburnell@focused-on.com | 10-Feb-2012 4:50 pm
Nor must we agressively chase Utilisation to the dangerous & counter-productive levels of Bed Occupancy seen in many Wards.
Nevertheless, I can accept that much of the NHS needs to be better organised around the natural peaks & troughs of Patient convenience - designing Accessible Services (including Prevention & Discharge), considered Fit-for-Purpose by the Patient, and evidently delivering Best-value to the Commissioner.
We need more streamlined, integrated Services designed to deliver Optimal Care because it will be lower Cost & higher Quality starting Up Stream.
Unsuitable or offensive?