New freedoms set out for NHS foundation trusts
Mergers will be considerably easier for foundation trusts under the rules set out in the health bill.
Combining two foundations will no longer require de-authorisation and a fresh application to become a foundation, but will instead be granted with the approval of more than half the governors from each trust.
The bill also deletes entirely the cap on private income, freeing foundations from limits on their commercial activity.
Section 150 simply omits the sub-sections of the 2006 National Health Service Act “restriction on provision of private health services” and “cap on private income”. It does not include any safeguards to ensure private activity benefits NHS patients – something politicians have previously called for.
Sue Slipman, director of the Foundation Trust Network, told HSJ the rules on mergers and removal of the cap were what the sector expected and wanted.
She said: “This bill completes the FT journey and will help release FTs’ potential. We will work with our members to inform the government on managing the risks during the transition period.”
Other powers in the bill include allowing the regulator to appoint a panel to advise governors.
The new failure regime for foundation trusts is also set out by the bill which will be trigged if “the regulator is satisfied that an NHS foundation trust is, or is likely to become, unable to pay its debts”.
The bill also includes what is being referred to as the “Hinchingbrooke clause”, which provides a legislative framework for allowing the privately managed trust – and others that may follow in its footsteps – to survive the abolition of NHS trusts on 1 April 2014.
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment.
Related images
Make-up and duties of health and wellbeing boards revealed
Health secretary to get powers over commissioning board
Commissioning transition to cost £1.2bn
Health Bill maintains light touch on consortia
Small consortia will reduce savings, warns DH
The Health and Social Care Bill 2011
National board will hire consortia leads and guide pay
Public health directors in grip of health secretary
FT oversight to move to DH bank
Commissioning board given 'draconian' powers
Bill could lead to 'dilution' of pensions benefits
Tribunal to have responsibility for settling disputes over protected services
Extent of health secretary's powers over NHS Commissioning Board 'surprising'
Bill paves way for consortia bail outs and risk sharing
Redundancy payouts to average £48,000
Your essential guide to the Health Bill
The commissioner's essential guide to the Health Bill
Share
Readers' comments (1)
Anonymous | 20-Jan-2011 10:16 am
What do markets do when competition is fully unleashed? Yes you have guessed it, mergers and acquisitions follow and the number of providers reduces, so roll on the probability of just a few juggernauts running the English acute sector... (apocryphally Monitor have looked at this scenario) agreed that there may be a few specialist trusts survive, but they will be few and far between. Reducing cost will be king and service rationalisation is easier when you run the whole service for say a 2-3 million population. They will first be known as Hospital Groups (think Guys and St. Thomas', SE London Hospitals etc.) and then US Hospitals Inc. The latter has the advantage that you do not have to publish the CEO's salary: its part of the overall management fee! Ands finally, if you live on the edge of England geographically I would think about moving now...
Unsuitable or offensive?