Now is the time to get back on schedule and ensure your trust is ready for the August deadline, since delays could bring penalties.Ingrid Torjesen reports
The NHS has had more than a decade to prepare for the European working time directive. But, with only four months to go, many trusts still have a lot of work to do to ensure they are compliant for doctors in training.
Penalties for trusts for non-compliance include possible employment tribunal proceedings by employees, orders for compliance (for example from the Health and Safety Executive in respect of night worker health assessments) and fines.
“In April 2008 53.4% of junior doctors were estimated to be compliant”
The European Commission may begin enforcement proceedings if the UK does not adequately implement the directive, which sets out minimum requirements for working hours, rest periods, annual leave and working arrangements for night workers. Central to it is a working week of no more than an average of 48 hours over 26 weeks.
It was enacted into UK law in October 1998, but the government negotiated an extension on working hours for doctors in training. They have worked a maximum of 56 hours per week since August 2007, under their pay agreement, but from August 2009 must work no more than an average of 48 hours each week.
Will trusts meet this deadline? Official figures, based on six-monthly New Deal returns, suggest that only 53.4 per cent of junior doctors were working a 48-hour week this time last year (see graphs). In more recent surveys by the Royal College of Physicians, 41 per cent of consultants, 50 per cent of registrars and 66 per cent of tutors thought trusts complied.
The UK government has recognised some trusts may not meet the deadline for all services and so it has informed the EU that it intends to take up the option of a derogation. This permits an average working week of 52 hours for trainee doctors for a set period of up to three years in specific named services. Services requiring 24-hour immediate patient care (for example, maternity, paediatrics and some surgery), supra specialist services and remote or rural units are most likely to require derogation. Difficulties securing extra doctors due to workforce constraints or the requirement to work across split sites beyond August might be valid reasons.
Red light means danger
The Department of Health wrote to SHAs last December asking them to list the services they thought required derogation. Only six responded with requests, listing 26 services in 13 trusts.
NHS Employers head of programmes David Grantham admits: “It doesn’t sound very many; that is why we are going back to the SHAs and asking: how rigorous have you been?”
SHAs are being asked to stress-test service plans and grade them using a traffic light system: green for already 48-hours compliant; amber for compliant with a bit of work; and red for a high risk of non-compliance. SHA stress-testing will assess plans by considering whether doctors might not be available and the contingences in place if they cannot be found, such as international recruitment or use of other staff.
Trusts with services graded red will be expected to discuss their position with the SHA.
“It might be [that] within an organisation you haven’t got a solution but between organisations you might have one,” Mr Grantham suggests.
If the EU allows derogation, the working time regulations will be amended to list trusts and services to be derogated and for how long Ω subject to UK parliamentary approval.
Monitoring of the New Deal arrangements will continue, but with no additional monitoring for compliance with the working time directive. If trainee doctors believe they are working excessive hours, they can complain and the employer will have to take action, including monitoring and reduced hours if the problem is confirmed. ●
The Workforce Projects Team - part of Skills for Health - has produced a range of support tools designed to help trusts, which are available on its website, and NHS Employers has published a framework for managing medical vacancies. For best practice case studies and practical advice from the team, turn to our special report, starting on page 25.
- New Deal monitoring for September 2008 in England revealed two thirds of doctors in training employed on contracts for 48 hours or less (according to DH figures published in January)
- NHS North West piloted early compliance with the directive and in August 2008 97 per cent of doctors in training were reported to be compliant
- The specialties with the lowest compliance are surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology and anaesthetics
- General practice, public health and accident and emergency have the highest compliance
- Emergency care practitioners have been supporting compliance by easing the pressures facing junior doctors in acute care
- Developed and introduced by South Yorkshire Ambulance Service, one of the objectives for the role was to reduce hospital attendance and admission rates
- ECPs treat emergencies in patients’ homes or the community and send them to hospital or refer them to other services only if needed
- The new role has resulted in an overall figure for avoided attendances or admissions of up to 60 per cent, with patient satisfaction consistently high
How to hit the working time limit
- Assess your position
- Involve clinicians in redesigning rotas, focusing on the level of cover really needed and how this can be best provided
- Start recruitment now - this is vital if looking internationally
- Make new posts attractive
- Highlight with the SHA now any services that might require derogation
- Apply for DH funding and support from SHAs to help move at-risk services to compliance
What help is there?
- The DH is making £310m available from 2009-10 to support implementation
- This is £200m on top of 2008-09 funds; of this, £150m will flow through tariff income to trusts, and £50m will be targeted to trusts by SHAs to support trained doctor solutions, particularly in paediatrics and obstetrics
- Trusts and SHAs can apply for this money for their plans