By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Serious about improving care? Then use the net promoter score

Health professionals are being urged to consider the way they measure the effectiveness of the care they give in a bid to further improve patient experience.

Get involved

How is your organisation listening to patients and working to improve their experience? Have your best practice case studies published in Resource Centre by emailing them to hsjresourcecentre@emap.com

Ruth Evans, director of the Patient Experience Network, believes 2012 should be the year an evaluation system that meets with the universal approval of the NHS and private health providers is adopted, thereby enabling healthcare teams to better understand and increasingly meet the needs of their patients.

The network would like to see a system such as the net promoter score (NPS) adopted widely. The organisation believes the system is consistent and simple and has the ability to reduce the complexity of implementation and analysis frequently associated with measures of satisfaction.

According to PEN, for many organisations – including many health providers in the US – NPS has provided a stable measure of organisational performance that can be compared across business units and even across industries.

“If the NHS and the private health sector is serious about raising the patient experience bar, then we need something like Net Promoter measuring and evaluating what we are doing on behalf of patients,” says Ms Evans.

It has been argued that such measures have limited use in healthcare. But PEN disagrees.

“It’s time for the healthcare professional to act decisively and for senior managers to adopt a consistent well-tried metric such as net promoter as their preferred measurement and evaluation methodology,” Ms Evans continues.

“I am sure such a move would be greeted with enthusiasm and support from all sectors of society, particularly those people who have need of hospital services.”

The net promoter score is obtained by asking customers the question: “How likely is it that you would recommend our company to a friend or colleague?” Scores are recorded on a 0-10 rating scale, where 10 is “extremely likely” and 0 is “not at all likely”.

Attracting fans

Last month, NPS was adopted by the strategic health authority cluster NHS Midlands and East in an attempt to “make it clear who is delivering excellent patient care, and those who need to improve”.

Ali Parsa, chief executive of Circle, a private healthcare organisation which has taken over responsibility for Hinchingbrook Health Care Trust, supports the call by PEN for the adoption of a robust measurement framework. He comments that “in the absence of comparisons many patients may be nudged to score their experience too highly, providing a justification for hospitals to do little to improve.”

The company asks its patients three simple questions: What did we do well? What could we do better? and would you recommend us to family and friends? It regularly reviews the feedback in its clinical units and hospitality team and follow-up actions are quickly implemented to improve patient experiences. 

Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust is also considering using NPS. Paul Sanguinazzi, head of involvement, at the trust says: “We are looking at using Net Promoter Score as an additional question to those we use already to measure people’s experience.

“For it to drive change, though, it needs to be adopted at a team level and for people to be asked for comments such as why they would or would not recommend the service. Also, while we see value in a universal measure we have concerns over whether it will be used too crudely to compare very different services and whether it is an appropriate question for some services such as secure mental health services”

Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals Foundation Trust has adopted NPS within the last year. In the last six months, the trust has seen a significant improvement in its overall NPS, which has been matched by improved numbers of positive comments on sites such as NHS Choices.

Suzanne Rankin, chief nurse at the trust, comments: “The score alone gives a useful indicator of patient loyalty and combined with other key measures provides important intelligence about the quality of patient care, treatment and experience. Nevertheless it is essential to support this data with qualitative feedback from patients in order to understand the underlying issues of poor and/or great experience.”

In future Ashford and St Peter’s plans to collect real-time feedback from patients about why they have given their score. This will enable frontline staff to engage with patients to gain qualitative insight into what they are doing that is driving patient experience.

Ms Evans concludes: “Greater transparency and accountability is an important part of the process that leads to a heightened and better patient experience. And that’s what a measure such as NPS delivers. Isn’t that something we should be embracing with open arms?”

Readers' comments (4)

  • NPS is a great tool in a number of ways, some of which are given a very shallow overview in this piece. As a certified NPS associate with extensive experience in the health sector I can say that there is a lot more to it than this. The ease of use of a single score and some verbatim comments seems to be a major reason that it is gaining traction. A new initiative will always have a slight groundswell, hence correlating well with other topline indicators. However the real meat behind NPS is behavioural, cultural and financial. There are a lot of core elements in the assembly of good quality NPS strategy that are simply not covered by most trusts. the worst case scenario is NPS goes up while operational quality goes down in key areas - and you won't know till it is too late. To understand more about my points get in touch, at Fr3dom Health we operate the Net Patient Score which is an enhanced model that caters for the specific challenges of the health sector rather than bussing in a concept from commercial environments where almost every equation from intent through to recommendation are driven very differently, and the organisational ability to respond is also very different. Net Patient Score is right for health, Net Promoter Score is a little wide of the mark.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Couple of questions:

    1) What does the peer-reviewed literature say about NPS in healthcare settings? Have there been any trials in the NHS?

    2) Would expanding PROMs be potentially more valuable, as this indicator also covers clinical outcomes?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • hi Cassander.
    1. Peer reviewed lit for NPS is health is a little thin on the ground. there is more from the US but of course that is a more commercial model than here. initiatives such as the east midlands have picked up on n the simplicity of NPS but not the real bloodline - which is cultural. They are also walking into the scenario i outline above.
    2. expanding PROMS would be a good plan irrespective of robust methodologies for patient experience. the real focus of PROMS is outcome not experience and because of the length of survey and funding model for it, the mandated way the surveys are set up it would be potentially more expensive than it would need to be. also PROMS would need to be far more ubiquitous than the current 6 or so procedures. A fine idea but in practice it might prove a bit costly - when net patient score is so simple and easy.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • With respect Toby you over complicate the friends and family test (UQ).

    I see the test operating like this:

    The question: On a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the most likely) what is the likelihood you would recommend the unit to friends or family?

    If they answer 9 or 10 you ask them what the unit did well?

    If they answer 8 or below you ask what one or two things the unit can do to improve?

    As you will know once things get more complicated the further away from the truth you travel. So what else apart from the 2 questions above do nurses need? We are not stupid?

    Cassander, I will post at least 1 paper regarding the UQ over the next few days.


    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

Sign up to get the latest health policy news direct to your inbox